“You never know beforehand what people are capable of, you have to wait, give it time, it’s time that rules, time is our gambling partner of the other side of the table and it holds all the cards of the deck in its hand, we have to guess the winning cards of life, our lives…” from Blindness
Summary: Beginning with one random motorist and spreading rapidly throughout an unnamed country, an epidemic of blindness deprives a nation of sight. Only one is spared and thus forced to witness the descent of a people from civilization into savagery. In an attempt at containment, the government quarantines the afflicted. During their internment, a small group of protagonists forms, including an ophthalmologist (ironically) and his wife, a young woman, a boy, an old man, and another husband and wife. The group bands together in a fight to survive even when all hope seems lost.
Notes: Though I highly recommend this novel, it is not an enjoyable story to read. Gritty and harrowing, it reminded me of the similarly disturbing work of William Golding in Lord of the Flies for its theme of the fragility of civilization. What tethers humanity to civilization? Truly could we so easily transform into beasts? The author employs reader-response technique, writing with minimal punctuation and depriving the reader of conventional descriptions and characterizations (such as names and additional identifying features), which can make for slower reading, but is effective for simulating the confusion and unknown experienced by the characters. Saramago won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1998.
Synopsis: “White sickness” sweeps through a metropolis, blinding an entire population. Initially the sightless are interned in an unused asylum, and conditions degenerate as more and more people are crammed into the facility. Among the interned is the only woman whose sight has been spared. She attempts to care for and protect her husband and the small group of people with whom they have banded together. When another group of internees seizes control of the food supply and demands payment in exchange for food, a horrifying war ensues as the interned struggle to survive.
Review: A project requiring the adaptation of a story about blindness to a medium wholly dependent upon visual effects cannot be anything but doomed from the outset. (Click the movie poster image to link to the Rotten Tomatoes page for Blindness.)
Book or Movie? Book. Blindness is about people in general, rather than individual characters. In the novel, the plot propels the reader forward, not an attachment to the characters. The characters are “Everymen,” but this characterization technique is not successful in the film. Without a dynamic, charismatic personality with which to identify, the audience fails to develop any emotional investment in the story.
Why I chose this book and film: Blindness is my husband’s book. He is Portuguese and I imagine he wanted to read Saramago solely for that reason. Indeed, Saramago is the only Portuguese writer I can name. A couple of weeks ago I found myself prowling around our book room in search of something to read and decided to give Blindness a go.
I was surprised at how quickly I was absorbed in the story. This is not an easy book to read, firstly for the lack of punctuation and paragraphs, secondly for the dark, gruesome imagery.
I was also surprised to discover the controversy that surrounded the theatrical release of Blindness in 2008. In this press release, the President of the National Federation of the Blind expresses his anger at the portrayal of blind people as “incompetent, filthy, vicious, and depraved.” He goes on to claim that “to portray the blind in this manner, even as alleged allegory or so-called social commentary, is outrageous and reprehensible–and it is a lie.”
With all due respect to the President of NFB, I have to question whether he read and understood Saramago’s novel. Blindness is not a story about blind people. It is a story about a nation of people who suffer a tremendous catastrophe and the ensuing chaos. It reflects on the dark side of humanity and is an important social commentary in a world whose people are increasingly dependent on this one of five senses. In response to the objections of the blind community to the movie, Saramago was quoted as saying, “Stupidity doesn’t choose between the blind and the non-blind.”